In an AI-powered world where lives are increasingly digitized, and every interaction leaves a digital footprint, the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act marks a significant milestone in India’s evolving digital governance framework. 

The Act has undergone several stages of deliberation and refinement, beginning with the 2017 Supreme Court ruling affirming privacy as a fundamental right, followed by multiple iterations of the Personal Data Protection Bill (2019, 2021, 2022) before culminating in the current DPDP Act (2023). Over the years, extensive stakeholder consultations, parliamentary debates, and industry feedback have shaped the Act, ensuring it is well-calibrated to balance individual rights, industry innovation, and national security. 

The Act is designed to establish a strong framework for data protection while ensuring integrity-driven compliance by businesses operating in India’s digital landscape. Some of the key provisions include: 

Explicit Consent Requirement: Organizations must provide clear and explicit consent before their data can be collected or processed, with special safeguards for children’s data requiring verifiable parental consent. The Act places specific restrictions on the collection and processing of children’s data, including a ban on behavioral tracking and targeted advertising for minors.  

• Data Fiduciary Responsibilities: Organizations handling personal data, known as Data Fiduciaries, must ensure security, accuracy, and lawful processing of data. 
• Cross-Border Data Transfers: Data transfers outside India will be restricted to certain approved jurisdictions, ensuring data protection standards are met. 
• Grievance Redressal & Data Protection Board: A centralized regulatory body, the Data Protection Board, will oversee compliance, handle user complaints, and enforce penalties for data breaches. 
• Legitimate Uses & Exemptions: In certain cases, such as government services, research, and national security, data can be processed without explicit consent. 

The Act is a comprehensive and well-deliberated piece of legislation aimed at addressing the increasing concerns around data privacy, security, and accountability. For EdTech players, the Act presents both opportunities and responsibilities, requiring them to rethink personalization strategies, data governance, consent mechanisms, and compliance frameworks. 

Why the DPDP Act Matters for EdTech

EdTech companies operate at the intersection of education, technology, and data. They rely on vast amounts of student, parent, and teacher data to personalize learning, improve educational outcomes, and scale their offerings. Given the rise in digital learning adoption, particularly post-pandemic, ensuring data privacy while still enabling technological advancements is crucial. The DPDP Act provides a much-needed legal framework to achieve this balance, offering clarity on data collection, processing, storage, and user rights. 

One of the Act’s biggest advantages is its user-centric approach, placing students, parents, and teachers at the center of data governance. By mandating explicit consent, it ensures that individuals’ rights are respected, reinforcing transparency in data collection. Additionally, the Act strengthens security measures, requiring organizations to implement robust protections against data breaches, which will enhance trust in digital learning platforms. Regulatory clarity is another major benefit, as the Act clearly defines the roles of Data Fiduciaries, Data Processors, and Significant Data Fiduciaries, providing structured guidelines for companies to operate within. Furthermore, its adaptability allows it to evolve alongside emerging technologies, ensuring that future EdTech innovations remain compliant while fostering responsible digital education. 

Key Implications for EdTech Companies

Consent & Data Collection Requirements

EdTech firms that act as data fiduciaries (e.g. in B2C models) will need to implement revamped consent management systems. The Act mandates explicit consent, particularly for children’s data, requiring verifiable parental approval. Additionally, companies must ensure data minimization, meaning they can only collect and process data essential to their stated educational purpose.

Restrictions on Behavioral Tracking & Targeted Advertising

EdTech firms cannot conduct behavioral tracking of children unless they are classified as Data Processors working on behalf of an educational institution. For companies that leverage Personalized Adaptive Learning (PAL) models, restrictions on behavioral tracking of children mean that they must ensure transparency in how data is used for improving learning outcomes. Additionally, targeted advertising based on student behavior is prohibited, requiring companies to explore alternate monetization models.

Compliance Costs & Operational Adjustments

EdTech companies playing the role of Data Fiduciaries will have to invest in compliance teams, appoint Data Protection Officers (DPOs), and establish grievance redressal mechanisms. While this increases operational costs, it also enhances consumer trust and credibility, making companies more attractive to parents, institutions, and investors.

Data Storage & Cross-Border Transfers

Data transfers outside India will be restricted to certain approved jurisdictions. This means that as long as data operations do not take place in a restricted country, companies should remain compliant. However, it remains advisable for EdTech firms to follow a data localization strategy, both because they could be classified as Significant Data Fiduciaries (a designation with unclear processes and obligations) and because future regulatory updates could impose additional restrictions on cross-border data transfers. Companies should proactively prepare for these possibilities by considering localized data storage and processing as a strategic approach.

Government Partnerships & Data Sharing Considerations

EdTech firms working with government bodies may not always need explicit parental consent when operating under a government contract. If an EdTech firm’s operations under a government contract can be considered as government service delivery or if the government educational institution acts as the Data Fiduciary, then verifiable parental consent is not required. Instead, compliance obligations would align with the agreement between the EdTech provider and the government entity. In such cases, firms must ensure that data is used strictly for the agreed-upon educational purpose and that data security and governance measures meet the required standards under the Act. 

Key Questions for the EdTech Sector to consider 

EdTech firms align with the DPDP Act, several key questions emerge that merit further discussion: 

• How can EdTech companies strike a balance between personalization and data minimization? Personalization can make learning more intuitive and human-centered—bridging gaps for underserved segments—and ultimately fostering greater digital equity. With the DPDP Act enforcing stricter rules, what alternative models can ensure adaptive learning remains effective without excessive data collection? 
• Can impact measurement frameworks be accommodated under research exemptions? Many EdTech firms rely on learning analytics and impact assessments to demonstrate efficacy to funders, governments, and institutions. Will these studies qualify under the research exemption? 
• How can companies structure their institutional contracts to operate as Data Processors rather than Fiduciaries? EdTech providers working through schools and government programs may explore structuring agreements to capitalize on the exemptions granted to educational institutions. 
• Would any current tracking methodologies, particularly in adaptive learning models, be considered behavioral monitoring? How can EdTech players navigate the fine line between personalized learning insights and compliance with behavioral tracking restrictions? 

Final Thoughts 

The DPDP Act is a much-needed step forward in strengthening India’s digital ecosystem. For EdTech firms, the Act presents both challenges and opportunities—requiring greater compliance but also creating an environment of trust, security, and responsible innovation. Companies that proactively adopt transparent, compliant, and ethical data practices, as they navigate the rapidly evolving technological advancements in AI & Machine Learning, will not only meet regulatory expectations but also strengthen their long-term brand credibility in the education sector. 

As the Act’s implementation unfolds, frequent discourse among industry leaders, policymakers, and educational institutions will be key to co-navigating grey areas, optimizing compliance strategies, and ensuring the EdTech ecosystem continues to deliver impact-driven personalized, and future-ready education solutions for learners across India.

For more information on the Act and its implications, contact: